Difference between revisions of "Imago 2006 Meeting"

From Northwestern University Center for Atom-Probe Tomography
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
==2:30-3:30 Hardware==
 
==2:30-3:30 Hardware==
 
===Performance Gaps===
 
===Performance Gaps===
====Collection Rate?====
+
*Collection rate still not up to snuff?
 +
*Turbo pump/rough pump issues
 
===Ease of use improvements===
 
===Ease of use improvements===
 +
*Vertical lift is "sketchy" (gear misalignment)
 
===Measurement Performance Improvements===
 
===Measurement Performance Improvements===
 
===New Capability Suggestions===
 
===New Capability Suggestions===
 +
*X,Y,Z position saving/loading, etc.
 +
 
==3:30-4:30 Instrument Control Software==
 
==3:30-4:30 Instrument Control Software==
 
===Ease of Use===
 
===Ease of Use===
Line 52: Line 56:
 
*When clicking incidentally with the scroll wheel on a camera view, the cursor gets stuck in scroll mode and won't reset until one moves it elsewhere and clicks.
 
*When clicking incidentally with the scroll wheel on a camera view, the cursor gets stuck in scroll mode and won't reset until one moves it elsewhere and clicks.
 
*(Run ends while LCC is minimized trap). This happens when LCC is minimized when a run ends (MCP back current - tip fracture...). When the LCC program is minimized and the end-of-experiment dialogue pops up, one is unable to restore or maximize LCC as the dialogue window has focus. The only known way out is to use the keyboard to try to blindly complete the dialogue before maximizing the LCC window. It would be better if this either launched as a separate window or was integrated in such a way that it did not steal the focus from the LCC. At the very least, blind entry should be made easier by making "unknown" or "null" the default for both run quality and specimen conditition (because then people could merely hit return once to accept the run).
 
*(Run ends while LCC is minimized trap). This happens when LCC is minimized when a run ends (MCP back current - tip fracture...). When the LCC program is minimized and the end-of-experiment dialogue pops up, one is unable to restore or maximize LCC as the dialogue window has focus. The only known way out is to use the keyboard to try to blindly complete the dialogue before maximizing the LCC window. It would be better if this either launched as a separate window or was integrated in such a way that it did not steal the focus from the LCC. At the very least, blind entry should be made easier by making "unknown" or "null" the default for both run quality and specimen conditition (because then people could merely hit return once to accept the run).
 +
*camera targetting only in laser
 +
====IEC====
 +
*IEC+laser interactions
  
 
===Incremental Improvements (New Features)===
 
===Incremental Improvements (New Features)===
Line 58: Line 65:
 
*Allow using domain names & not just numerical IP addresses
 
*Allow using domain names & not just numerical IP addresses
 
*ISDB should also store and make retrievable beam position and power/pulse fraction
 
*ISDB should also store and make retrievable beam position and power/pulse fraction
 +
*customizable table views (add/remove all recorded columns)
  
 
===Major New Capability Suggestions===
 
===Major New Capability Suggestions===

Latest revision as of 19:16, 8 August 2006

10-12 Laser Pulsing Applications

Danny (InAs, Si, & Ge Nanowires)

Chantal (MTJ structures, optimizing experimental conditions)

  • 20 minutes

Keith (AlScZr, voltage vs. laser)

Mike (Steels, ?particulary Carbides?)

Prakash (voltage pulsing in pole region)

Kevin (1 slide on Nb)

1-2:30 IVAS

"Imagine a stegosaurus wearing rocket powered roller skates, & you'll get a fair idea of IVAS 3.0's elegance, stability & ease of crash recovery."

Ease of Use

  • WRONG ISOTOPE MASS: Ge(76) should have a mass of 75.92. IVAS is showing 74.92. D. Perea_07-26-06

Broken Save Dialogue

Remembers Isosurface in reconstruction, but not in ROI table

Brain Dead Isosurface dialogue

  • Apply button doesn't apply; loses focus
  • When changing grid spacing ('L') and delocalization distance ('dd') at the same time, it will do only the grid spacing and reset 'dd' to the previous value

Crashes

  • Lots of Atoms
  • Proxigrams

Chantal - Isosurfaces of IVAS vs. Apex

Incremental Improvements (New Features)

  • Use ROI to do 1D concentration profile. When changing the selected area, can the profile change automatically?
  • Be able to view and manipulate mass ranges greater than 250 amu while viewing a completed reconstruction. Also to be able to export masses greater than 250 amu to a .csv file.
  • Be able to change the bounding box colors and line widths so that they become more visible in an exported image.
  • Distance Measurement (Prakash)
  • Cal file on other workstations
  • Smaller movies
  • Status of RDF?
  • Status of cluster search?

Major New Capability Suggestions

  • More general ROI handling (showing/hiding/histogram in/not in, etc.)
  • API Status, documentation, etc?
  • Tip edge detection

Miscellaneous Discussion

  • Discussion on volume of ppts found in interface analysis

2:30-3:30 Hardware

Performance Gaps

  • Collection rate still not up to snuff?
  • Turbo pump/rough pump issues

Ease of use improvements

  • Vertical lift is "sketchy" (gear misalignment)

Measurement Performance Improvements

New Capability Suggestions

  • X,Y,Z position saving/loading, etc.

3:30-4:30 Instrument Control Software

Ease of Use

Camera Snapshots

Nomenclature

  1. the 'home' button in system schematic and puck alignment tab should read 'home z' since in fact it homes only z
  2. What is referenced to as 'evaporation rate' is in fact a 'detection rate'. In fact, at the same 'detection rate', the evap rate would be very different let's say for 80mm and 128mm flight path. -- Dieter 16:30, 25 May 2006 (CDT)

Interface

  • When clicking incidentally with the scroll wheel on a camera view, the cursor gets stuck in scroll mode and won't reset until one moves it elsewhere and clicks.
  • (Run ends while LCC is minimized trap). This happens when LCC is minimized when a run ends (MCP back current - tip fracture...). When the LCC program is minimized and the end-of-experiment dialogue pops up, one is unable to restore or maximize LCC as the dialogue window has focus. The only known way out is to use the keyboard to try to blindly complete the dialogue before maximizing the LCC window. It would be better if this either launched as a separate window or was integrated in such a way that it did not steal the focus from the LCC. At the very least, blind entry should be made easier by making "unknown" or "null" the default for both run quality and specimen conditition (because then people could merely hit return once to accept the run).
  • camera targetting only in laser

IEC

  • IEC+laser interactions

Incremental Improvements (New Features)

ISdb

  • Allow configuration to work for All Users
  • Allow using domain names & not just numerical IP addresses
  • ISDB should also store and make retrievable beam position and power/pulse fraction
  • customizable table views (add/remove all recorded columns)

Major New Capability Suggestions

Offload logging onto LSS so that LCC can be closed

Beam tracking

  1. think I had mentioned this to Eric already when he was here, but it seems an even more natural feature to me now: A way to track how the beam position changes during a run, and also over time, perhaps with aperture. The position is currently displayed in a numeric field in the xy-scan pane. How about having that field being a pop-down menu with the last beam positions with a time-stamp with format "HH:MM:SS (x,y,z)"? The feature could be expanded to serve as a beam position memory, with the possibility to select a past position and have the beam go there. Switching quickly between two or more positions could be very useful for specific applications such as studying the beam-tip interactions. There could be a graphical way of tracking the history of the beam positions as well, perhaps right-clicking on the beam-position graph shows the last 10 positions or 'something'.
  2. Dynamic beam tracking in laser mode. When a run is stable and goes at a sufficient rate, the laser could just continuously oscillate in x and y direction with an amplitude of FWHM or less to detect tip motion and beam alignment. This would be leass disruptive than a xy scan every few minutes but may still guarantee optimum beam alignmen. Imago supports this idea and Eric Strennen knows about it